Solutions /
Climate risk

Hazard data turned into
asset-level financial exposure

Physical and transition risk assessed at asset level, in financial terms, and written up for disclosure and for planning.
Start your journey
See our impact
Climate risk
11,400
Assets screened
4
Scenarios modeled per portfolio
2050
Standard planning horizon
Risk expressed in money
Overview

Risk expressed in money

A heat map is not a decision. We join hazard data to your own operational data so exposure arrives as a financial number a board can allocate against.
Asset-level hazard screening
Physical and transition scenarios
Financial exposure quantification
Adaptation options and costs
Disclosure drafting and assurance
Annual model refresh
Take this service
Benefits

Why exposure has to
reach a number

Six reasons quantified climate risk gets funded and qualitative climate risk does not.
Capital allocated well
Capital allocated well
Adaptation spending goes where exposure is largest rather than where concern is loudest.
Losses avoided
Losses avoided
Sites identified early can be protected during a scheduled outage rather than after a flood.
Insurance conversations
Insurance conversations
Quantified exposure and mitigation evidence change what an insurer is willing to write.
Disclosure satisfied
Disclosure satisfied
Scenario analysis produced for planning also satisfies the climate sections of disclosure.
Resilient supply chains
Resilient supply chains
Supplier sites screened alongside your own, because exposure rarely stops at the fence.
Decisions with lead time
Decisions with lead time
Trigger conditions defined now mean adaptation starts before the risk materializes.
Models you can interrogate
Why we are

Models you can interrogate

Climate risk work fails when nobody outside the modeling team can explain how a number was reached.
Asset-level resolution
Exposure computed per site, not smoothed across a region or a business unit.
Your own operational data
Hazard joined to your throughput, headcount and margin, which is what makes it financial.
Transparent assumptions
Every scenario choice documented, with sensitivity shown around the ones that matter.
Options with triggers
Adaptation written with costs, lead times and the conditions that should start the work.

Climate risk work produces a heat map in most companies and a decision in very few. The difference is whether the analysis ever reaches a financial number that a planner or an auditor can use.

Physical risk, asset by asset

We screen every material site against hazards that matter for its geography and function: riverine and coastal flooding, heat stress on people and on equipment, water scarcity, wildfire, wind and subsidence. Screening runs across at least two warming scenarios and at least two time horizons, because the ranking of your most exposed sites changes between them.

Exposure is then converted to consequence using your own operational data — what a week of downtime at that plant costs, whether production can be shifted, what the insurance deductible is, and how long the equipment lead time runs.

Transition risk, modeled not narrated

  • Carbon pricing exposure under explicit and implicit price paths
  • Demand shifts in the product mix as customers decarbonize
  • Technology substitution timing in your sector
  • Reputational and litigation exposure where public claims have been made

The useful output is a number in the capital plan. A red square on a matrix has never moved a budget.

Supply chain, where most of the exposure hides

Single-source components from a single flood-exposed region are a common and largely unmapped concentration. We trace critical inputs to at least the second tier and test what a regional disruption does to your ability to deliver.

Adaptation that gets funded

Each material risk leaves with an adaptation option, a cost, a lead time and a trigger — the observable condition that says it is time to act. That structure is what lets a board approve spending against a risk that has not materialized yet, and it is also what disclosure regimes are increasingly asking to see.

FAQs

Frequently asked
questions

Frequently asked questions
Photovoltaic modules convert sunlight directly into direct current electricity, which an inverter converts to alternating current for your site or the grid. Output follows irradiance rather than demand, which is why we model your hourly load alongside the resource before fixing a system size.
Every engagement starts from your own data — interval meter readings, an asset register, or a year of on-site measurement — rather than from a template. The design that follows is sized to your load profile, site constraints and growth plan, and we show you the trade-offs we made on the way.
Advisory engagements usually run six to sixteen weeks. Built projects depend almost entirely on permitting and grid connection: a commercial rooftop can be energized inside a year, while utility-scale generation typically runs two to four years from site control to commercial operation.
Yes. We build the inventory, install the controls, map one data set out to whichever frameworks apply to you, and draft the disclosure itself. We also run assurance readiness reviews so the first engagement with an auditor is not the first time the process is tested.
We build the pathway from your asset register, aligning abatement to replacement cycles so you are not writing off working equipment. We also quantify the residual emissions honestly and help you procure durable removals against them, rather than assuming the last ten percent away.