Solutions /
Waste management

Reducing the volume before
improving the disposal

Material flow analysis, diversion programs and extended producer responsibility, aimed at reducing volume before improving disposal.
Start your journey
See our impact
Waste management
62%
Median volume reduction
91%
Diversion from landfill
14
Producer responsibility schemes navigated
Material flow before waste flow
Overview

Material flow before waste flow

Recycling better is the second question. The first is why the material entered the site at all, which is where the largest and cheapest reductions live.
Material flow analysis
Packaging and specification review
Segregation and infrastructure design
Contractor tendering and audit
Producer responsibility compliance
Diversion reporting and verification
Take this service
Benefits

Why volume reduction
comes first

Six reasons the cheapest tonne of waste is the one that never arrives at the site.
Lower disposal cost
Lower disposal cost
Reduced volume cuts gate fees, haulage and handling at the same time and permanently.
Lower embodied emissions
Lower embodied emissions
Material not purchased carries no upstream footprint, which is the larger share of the impact.
Less contractor dependence
Less contractor dependence
A smaller, cleaner waste stream is easier to tender and cheaper to move between contractors.
Producer fees reduced
Producer fees reduced
Extended producer responsibility charges fall directly with packaging weight and material choice.
Verified diversion
Verified diversion
Segregation designed for the actual stream produces diversion figures that survive an audit.
Durable savings
Durable savings
A specification change keeps saving every year, unlike a recycling rate that depends on behavior.
Measured streams, not assumed ones
Why we are

Measured streams, not assumed ones

Almost every waste program we inherit was designed around what people believed was in the bins rather than what was.
Composition audits
Physical sampling of the actual stream before any infrastructure is specified.
Specification upstream
Packaging and material choices addressed with procurement, where the volume is decided.
Infrastructure that fits
Bin placement and segregation designed around how the site already works.
Contractor accountability
Weighbridge data audited against invoices, because the two disagree more often than not.

Waste is the one environmental cost most organizations can reduce with a short payback, and the one they measure worst. A site that reports ninety percent diversion on the strength of a contractor’s summary sheet frequently turns out, on a physical audit, to be nearer sixty.

Audit before target

We sort. A representative sample from each stream is physically characterized, weighed and photographed, which produces two things a weighbridge ticket cannot: an accurate composition, and an evidence base for renegotiating a contract that has been priced on assumptions.

Composition data usually reveals that a small number of materials drive most of the cost — contaminated packaging, mixed plastics film, and food waste in a general stream that turns the whole load into a higher disposal tariff.

Reduce, then divert, then dispose

  • Procurement changes that stop the material entering the site at all
  • Segregation at source, with bin infrastructure designed around how people actually move
  • Reuse and repair channels for equipment and furniture, which usually beat recycling on both cost and carbon
  • Stream-specific recycling contracts, priced on clean material
  • Residual disposal chosen last, and measured

Aggregate diversion rate is a flattering metric. Track the streams individually or you will optimize the easy ones and ignore the expensive one.

Extended producer responsibility

Where you place packaging, batteries, electricals or textiles on a market, producer responsibility fees now depend on what you place and how recyclable it is. We map the obligations across the jurisdictions you sell into, model the fee exposure under modulated rates, and identify the packaging changes that reduce the fee enough to pay for themselves.

Reporting that survives audit

Every figure we report ties to a transfer note or a weighbridge record, with the composition assumptions stated. That is what lets a waste number appear in an assured sustainability statement rather than in a footnote marked as an estimate.

FAQs

Frequently asked
questions

Frequently asked questions
Photovoltaic modules convert sunlight directly into direct current electricity, which an inverter converts to alternating current for your site or the grid. Output follows irradiance rather than demand, which is why we model your hourly load alongside the resource before fixing a system size.
Every engagement starts from your own data — interval meter readings, an asset register, or a year of on-site measurement — rather than from a template. The design that follows is sized to your load profile, site constraints and growth plan, and we show you the trade-offs we made on the way.
Advisory engagements usually run six to sixteen weeks. Built projects depend almost entirely on permitting and grid connection: a commercial rooftop can be energized inside a year, while utility-scale generation typically runs two to four years from site control to commercial operation.
Yes. We build the inventory, install the controls, map one data set out to whichever frameworks apply to you, and draft the disclosure itself. We also run assurance readiness reviews so the first engagement with an auditor is not the first time the process is tested.
We build the pathway from your asset register, aligning abatement to replacement cycles so you are not writing off working equipment. We also quantify the residual emissions honestly and help you procure durable removals against them, rather than assuming the last ten percent away.