Solutions /
Sustainability reporting

One controlled data set,
every framework it has to serve

Disclosure across the frameworks that apply to you, produced from controlled data and ready for assurance.
Start your journey
See our impact
Sustainability reporting
9
Frameworks served from one data set
4 wk
Median drafting cycle
0
Unreconciled figures at filing
Disclosure produced, not assembled
Overview

Disclosure produced, not assembled

Reporting goes wrong when each framework gets its own spreadsheet. Build one controlled metric layer and the disclosures become an output rather than a project.
Framework applicability mapping
Single metric definition layer
Data lineage and controls
Narrative drafting and review
Assurance readiness review
Filing and stakeholder packs
Take this service
Benefits

Why controlled data
changes reporting

Six reasons the reporting cycle shortens when the numbers stop being rebuilt every year.
Lower reporting cost
Lower reporting cost
One data set feeding nine frameworks costs less than nine processes feeding one report each.
Figures that agree
Figures that agree
A single definition per metric removes the reconciliation work that consumes the filing window.
Faster cycles
Faster cycles
Drafting starts from produced numbers rather than waiting on a data-gathering exercise.
Assurance without panic
Assurance without panic
Lineage and controls are what an auditor asks for first, and they already exist.
Reliable restatement
Reliable restatement
When a factor or boundary changes, prior years restate automatically and traceably.
Long-term comparability
Long-term comparability
Definitions under version control keep a five-year trend meaningful.
A reporting process your team can run
Why we are

A reporting process your team can run

We build the machinery and hand it over, because a report that only a consultant can produce is a dependency, not a capability.
One definition per metric
Agreed once, documented, and used by every framework mapping.
Lineage to source
Each disclosed figure traces to a system of record with no manual link in the chain.
Controls your auditors chose
Designed with internal audit so the first external test is not the first test.
Documented handover
Runbooks and training, so next year's cycle does not need us.

Reporting has changed from a communications exercise into a controls exercise. The frameworks now ask for comparability, for connectivity with the financial statements, and increasingly for third-party assurance. That changes who has to be in the room.

One data set, several outputs

Companies that maintain separate workflows for each framework end up publishing figures that disagree with each other, which is the worst possible outcome. We build a single disclosure data set with one definition per metric, then map it out to whichever standards apply — the European sustainability reporting standards, the ISSB’s requirements, GRI, and any sector or customer-specific questionnaires.

The mapping is maintained as a document, so when a standard changes you amend a mapping rather than rebuild a process.

Getting ready for assurance

  • A control matrix covering every material metric, with a named preparer and reviewer
  • Evidence retained in a form an auditor can sample
  • Estimates flagged, with methodology and uncertainty stated
  • A dry run against the assurance standard before the engagement begins

Limited assurance is not a light touch. It is a full review of whether your process could have produced a materially wrong number.

Writing the thing

We draft as well as advise. That means narrative that explains variance instead of hiding it, charts that show the same base year throughout, and a clear separation between what has been achieved and what has been committed to. Greenwashing enforcement has made vague progress language a legal risk, not just a reputational one.

Production includes digital tagging where your regime requires it, accessible design, and a version of the content that works for the people who will never read a hundred-page PDF — customers, procurement teams and job candidates among them.

We also brief the people who will have to answer questions about the report afterward: investor relations, procurement, and whoever fields the customer questionnaires. A disclosure that the organization cannot discuss confidently is only half published.

FAQs

Frequently asked
questions

Frequently asked questions
Photovoltaic modules convert sunlight directly into direct current electricity, which an inverter converts to alternating current for your site or the grid. Output follows irradiance rather than demand, which is why we model your hourly load alongside the resource before fixing a system size.
Every engagement starts from your own data — interval meter readings, an asset register, or a year of on-site measurement — rather than from a template. The design that follows is sized to your load profile, site constraints and growth plan, and we show you the trade-offs we made on the way.
Advisory engagements usually run six to sixteen weeks. Built projects depend almost entirely on permitting and grid connection: a commercial rooftop can be energized inside a year, while utility-scale generation typically runs two to four years from site control to commercial operation.
Yes. We build the inventory, install the controls, map one data set out to whichever frameworks apply to you, and draft the disclosure itself. We also run assurance readiness reviews so the first engagement with an auditor is not the first time the process is tested.
We build the pathway from your asset register, aligning abatement to replacement cycles so you are not writing off working equipment. We also quantify the residual emissions honestly and help you procure durable removals against them, rather than assuming the last ten percent away.